![]() Although the major feature of Visual Studio Code is being a code editor, with the addition of extensions, it becomes more than just a code editor. With the addition of framework, library, and language plugin extensions, you can leverage this even further with ready-made boiler-plates. It’s built into the design and your desired workspace set up. ![]() You don’t need to have multiple screens to run the different consoles and rearrange them each time you need to minimize something. ![]() Visual Studio Code has an in-built debugger, making the development flow less ‘clicky’ and maintains a single view with code and debugger. So, when the number of plugins increases in Atom, it adds the sluggish behavior by placing it behind the Visual Studio code in terms of performance. On the contrary, the Atom uses an extension-based approach to almost everything. Visual Studio Code has a firmly composed crux set of functionalities with plugins adding exterior level features. Each of these editors is based on Electron - a framework for creating "native" desktop apps with web technologies - HTML, CSS, JS - with the addition of Node.js.Įven if Atom was the first, everyone who has used both of these editors, at least to some small extent, must agree - VS Code is just faster. A little backgroundīoth the VS Code and Atom are open-source code editors, originally created by Microsoft and GitHub respectively. Long story short, I settled down upon VS Code. ![]() Atom has been around a while, but Visual Studio Code was once the new kid in town no one was quite sure about. Sure, there are plenty of other editors, but these two are among the most talked about. If you're searching for the perfect code editor, there's a good chance that you've run into both Atom and Visual Studio Code. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |